Loading....
Recent Article links:

Something to Think About

    When you cannot make up your mind which of two evenly balanced courses of action you should take - choose the bolder.
    William Joseph Slim


    Happiness is not something you postpone for the future; it is something you design for the present.
    Jim Rohn


    I learned that it is the weak who are cruel, and that gentleness is to be expected only from the strong.
    Leo Rosten


Archive for October, 2007

Hitchens, apparently, is bleeding insane

PZ Myers reports on his experiences at the Freedom From Religion Convention, including a lengthy description of Christopher Hitchens’s talk, where Hitchens apparently goes of the deep end and gives full rein to his revenge fantasies against Muslims.

Great. With Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, we get two prominent and articulate spokespeople for godlessness who responded to 9/11 with bigotry against Muslims. Hell, that’s half the public face of atheism in English-speaking circles, these days. Both seem incapable of distinguishing between fanatics and ordinary boring Muslims, both like to whip up quasi-nationalist panic under the name of Enlightenment values, and both make pronouncements with the invincible confidence born of ignorance of what they so readily demonize.

It’s hard to avoid the thought that Harris and Hitchens endorse the kind of violence implict in a war against Islam. This is, it seems, a war they would really like, though they do their cheerleading under the guise of asking us to wake up to a war that Muslims have already started. I wonder how they get away with this, especially since an important element of their polemic against religion is the charge that faith is irredemeably mixed up with violence.

New York City Meet-up Update

Erin and I are in our hotel room in Midtown Manhattan.  We’ve only been in the city about 30 hours so far, but it’s been a fun trip.  More on that later…  Right now we’re having some challenges with the NYC meet-up we planned to do on Saturday, October 20.  For those who are interested in attending, here’s the current situation.

First, about 85 people have already confirmed their interest in attending the meet-up, and we’re getting several more confirmations each day.  I’m sure there will be some no-shows, but many people are also saying they plan to bring friends and/or family members too, so we could easily have over 100 people.  While it’s great to see such numbers, that many people pose a real challenge.

When we did our Vegas meet-up in May, I think we had about 18 people show up, but only a dozen at any one time.  We just stood around in a circle and talked for a while, and then we broke into small groups or 2 or 3.  That worked very well.  But that approach won’t scale well to 100+ people at the same time.

How would a meet-up even work for this many people?  It could be chaotic.  If people want to talk to Erin and me one on one, we wouldn’t be able to talk to each person for very long if we want to be fair — maybe just a minute or two.  If we stick with one-to-many communication (like a group Q&A), people would have to squeeze in very close to hear us without a sound system.  I suppose the best outcome would be if people come and break into groups to talk to each other, but I can’t predict whether that will happen.

The weather in NYC is really nice right now (highs in the mid-60s F), but it’s supposed to rain the second half of this week.  The forecast currently shows that it may rain on the day of the meet-up.  So that makes it risky to commit to a meeting outdoors.  I’m also concerned that we’d need a permit if we invite 100 people to meet in the park.  It’s not clear to Erin and me if we’d need one or not.

We’ve been scouting for indoor meet-up locations, but we haven’t found anything suitable yet that’s available on Oct 20 and doesn’t charge an exorbitant fee.  A lecture hall setup isn’t ideal.  We didn’t really want to give a lecture or do an impromptu workshop — we just wanted the chance to meet people and talk.  Some places offer free or cheap meeting rooms for non-profits, but we don’t qualify.  While this is a non-profit meet-up (totally free, no product sales or upselling or anything like that), we don’t run a non-profit organization.

To top it off, Erin has received 21 requests for in-person readings during our trip, which would require 21 hours to do them all.  While it’s great to see that, she definitely won’t be able to do that many.  But that’s a separate challenge that is easy enough to resolve.

Erin and I have been trying to figure out what to do for the meet-up, but so far we don’t have a good solution.  Here are some of the options:

Location

  • Outdoors.  Have the meet-up in a public park outdoors, most likely either Bryant Park or somewhere in Central Park.  If it rains, it rains.  This isn’t so great if people have to use the bathroom either.
  • Indoors.  Try to find a suitable indoor meet-up location that will host us cheaply or for free.  Erin and I have limited time to look for a place, but if you happen to know of a good place that’s available Oct 20 and which can comfortably house 100 people (maybe more), let us know.  Otherwise we’re basically stuck with outdoors.
  • Scavenger Hunt.  Tell everyone the meet-up is in Central Park, but don’t be any more specific than that.  Whoever manages to find us can attend the meet-up.  Whoever doesn’t gets some exercise.  This should keep the group size manageable.  Yes, this is just a joke.  ;)

Meet-up structure

  • Chaos.  Just invite everyone to the same spot at the same time, and let it be as chaotic as it wants to be.  Whatever happens, happens.
  • Managed chaos.  Erin and I will try to spend a little time with each person one on one to be fair, even if it isn’t much, while encouraging everyone to talk amongst themselves.
  • Multiple meet-ups.  Erin and I could try to host smaller meet-ups throughout the week.  I’m not sure how much time we’ll have to do this, and there wouldn’t be much advance notice.  This can get complicated if we try to restrict how many people show up to each meet-up.
  • Limit the meet-up size.  Limit the meet-up to 20-30 people max, maybe on a first-come, first-served basis for the people who signed up first.  I really don’t like this option, but I’m throwing it out there.

So what do you think our best option is?  Maybe it’s something we haven’t thought of yet.  The challenge is that we don’t have a good grasp on why each person wants to attend the meet-up.  If you’re one of those people, please let us know what you’d most want from this meet-up.  Do you want the chance to talk to me and Erin one-on-one, do you just want a minute to meet us, do you want to see us do some group Q&A on the topics we write about, or do you want to meet other personal growth enthusiasts who are local to you?

Erin and I don’t want to cancel the meet-up.  But we want to be up front that it could be somewhat chaotic if we stick to the original plan.


Discuss this post in the Steve Pavlina forum.

© 2007 by Steve Pavlina. If you find these ideas helpful, please leave a donation for Steve so you can enjoy the spirit of giving too.

Paraliminals

For The Record

I know it has been some time since I have posted here, and it has been even longer since I have posted anything here worth reading. Well I was feeling a bit sentimental today, so I dug up a moldy-oldy I posted to the Democratic Underground a couple months back that didn't get a whole lot of play…so I am resurrecting it. Enjoy!

read more »



Globe Story on HD


Today’s Globe has this moving story about Canadian scientist Jeffrey Carroll. Carroll, who is only 30 years old, has Huntington’s Disease and is working on cure for it. You can learn more about HD from this site. Here are a few excerpts from the story:

No one knows this better than Mr. Carroll, a slender, fit man who looks like the poster child for good health. He knows what awaits him: Huntington’s disease killed his grandmother and, more recently, his mother, Cindy Carroll, who died in December at the age of 54. Near the end, she had to be placed on floor mats in the nursing home in a Washington state town, so severe was her violent, involuntary thrashing.

This is the inherent viciousness of the disease: A child who watches it slowly kill a parent has a 50-per-cent chance of developing it, creating this perpetual cycle of grief and suffering.

….Jeffrey Carroll decided to undergo the test in 2003, wanting the certainty of knowing what the future held. He had already been through the physical – he had no neurological symptoms of the disease – and he had undergone psychological counselling. He was 25, married and an undergraduate biology student working in a laboratory. He was as ready as he ever would be.

On July 21, 2003, on a clear Vancouver day, Mr. Carroll showed up for his appointment with his wife, Megan Carroll, then 28.

The physician unfolded the piece of paper and read the test result out loud. In one brief moment, he learned he tested positive for the gene. Megan let out a noise she described as something between a gasp and a sob.

“And Jeff,” she recalls, “asked for a job.”

Mr. Carroll told the doctor that he was keen to be involved in finding a treatment. He wanted to help.

…….Life has been particularly sweet for Mr. Carroll over the past 15 months. When he learned he carried the Huntington’s gene, he thought that fatherhood was out of the question. But when he heard about pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, which combines genetic screening with in-vitro fertilization, that all changed.

He and his wife decided to tackle this high-tech fertility treatment as a way to ensure they do not have a child who would ultimately carry the disease. It all worked – two unaffected embryos that did not carry the genetic mutation were implanted and twins, a boy and a girl, were born on June 27, 2006.

Cheers,
Colin

A subtle lesson

Sometimes the difficulty of blogging is that what seems blog-worthy is so subtle, it’s very difficult to express. That’s what’s been going on with me, recently. Nothing big, dramatic, or exciting. Subtle things.
For instance, I had an experience recently with getting off on a bad start one morning having to listen to a political discussion […]

Blog Talk Radio Brings Maryscott O’Connor to You

copyright © 2007 Maryscott O’Connor


Ready or not, here it comes: (And a pre-emptive apology: Forgive me, please… For purposes of this being an Announcement and all, I may slip into referring to myself in third person… at least it ain’t the Royal We, ‘kay?)

Next Monday, October 22, at 1pm Pacific, 4pm Eastern, Maryscott O’Connor / MSOC (EmSock to friends and enemies alike) intends to make her maiden foray into that area between “alternative media” and “traditional media” — that being the Internet-based “Blog Talk Radio.”

The designated sobriquet for said radio talk show is, of course, the only possible identification one could choose: My Left Wing Talk Radio.

This is the description of the show as it appears on My Left Wing Talk Radio’s BlogTalkRadio Page:

Maryscott O’Connor hosts a show to discuss the godawful mess of a world in which we’re living — and what, if anything, we can do about it. And she’ll probably end up talking about blogging — a lot.

Call-in listeners and live bloggers at MyLeftWing.com are essential.

This show is designed to be Interactive; MSOC will respond to livebloggers and callers alike; so Join the Party, people.



I’ve got a pretty solid plan for the format, a full slate of topics and an outline — not a text or script, per se, but something like what some comedians use when they’re working with new material — you know?

Anyway . . . I am actually pretty damned hyped up about this. For some unknowable (to me, anyway) reason, I have this sort of vibrating, persistent buzz that’s not really physical or mental… hard to describe this . . . anyway . . . I just have this feeling that I am going to be kind of good at this.

Or not. Who knows? May fall flat on my face.  I’ve scheduled it for half an hour. They give you the option of 15, 30, 45 or 60 minutes.  I thought 15 was just silly for a talk radio show– 15 minutes is better suited to monologuists, I think. But 45 and 60? For a novice like me, the notion of three quarters of an hour, let alone a full hour, seemed just a bit too much to fill on a first go around.

So a half hour it shall be; and I hope that at least the MLW crew of regulars will take the time to stop and listen, call in, liveblog and help make this inaugural outing at least a fun experiment, if nothing else. I have higher hopes than that — am considering doing a PR push of sorts, actually…

But come October 22, 1pm my time, let’s make this a group effort, shall we? No matter what the “EmSock Is A Drama Queen / Attention Whore” crowd say, fact is, I’m just as insecure and shy as the next person, and it’d be so nice to have my friends with me on this new adventure.

Serenity On This Sunday


Colleen - The Happy Sea

copyright © 2007 Betsy L. Angert

Please sit; settle in.  Ponder the configuration.  Contemplate, and come to a world more serene than the one you imagine you live in.  Center your self and trust the woes within need not be.  Often as we dash about, dilemmas abound.  Few of us take the time to understand what we create.  Chaos is contrived.  We hide hurts, and hinder any healing.  We “communicate,” chatter, speak, shriek, and rarely listen.  We do not inquire, “How do you feel?”  Well, we do; however, our query is as insincere, hasty, or as inhibited as the average answer.

Perhaps on this tranquil day of rest you, he, she, or I might pose the question “How are you?” to our selves.  Breathe deeply and reflect.  Then, after ample thought tell your self what you have not dared utter.  Speak of the fear that kept you quiet.  Share the story with those you are close to emotionally.  Perhaps, you will discover as I have on many occasions; I never needed to veil the horrors that harmed me.

What I did that was ghastly was more so to me than it was to those that love me.  I learned long ago, in truth, I, we are less fond of me than others might be.  Those close to my heart are far more knowledgeable than I when the subject is me, myself, and I.

Take some time on this quiet day of rest and let yourself be.  Touch your heart, mind, and soul tenderly.  Cogitate calmly.  Deliberate deeply.  Ruminate restfully.  Meditate and say, “Me, meet me.” 

Please share what you sense, your story, your spirit, or as you choose.

Being Present.

We carry a lot inside us as we make it through the world; perhaps so much more than we ever realize. We never really know what is going on in the heart and soul of a person when we look him/her in the eyes; we may think we know; we may have suspicions, but the reality is we don’t know for certain what another person is dealing with in his/her life.

We don’t know their history; we don’t know what has shaped and formed another’s way of seeing their reality.

It’s easy to judge; give advice; and to tell people what they need, but much more difficult to be present to another; to listen without prejudice; to meet them where they are in their journey.

We do the same with ourselves. Sometimes we don’t know what is really going on inside us for we haven’t listened to our soul. We think we know; we have suspicions, but often times we don’t really know for we haven’t listened.

Ever had someone tell you what you “think”? Have you ever had someone tell you what you “feel”? Doesn’t feel all that good does it? I’ve done it; I do it; I’ve had “it done” to me. Granted, I am more conscious and aware when I feel the tendency to do it, but I know more often than not that when I am telling someone what they need, it’s more about me than it is them. And what I do, is simply create a space where a person shuts down and no longer feels safe to share.

It seems that for many, we’re just uncomfortable with the messiness and ugliness of life or if another shares something that doesn’t quite match-up with our experience, beliefs, or understanding we want to control, withdrawl, fix, judge, gossip, but rarely are we simply present and listen.

For me, when I pour out my heart, soul, life, and pain to another and he/she is simply present and listens, I heal. I thank God for the people who have been vulnerable before me; it draws me closer to them, God, and myself. When I get unsolicited advice or am “told” what I need, I usually shut down. I suspect when I give unsolicited advice or “tell” people what they need, I play God, and they shut down.

We need one another other, and when we are simply present to one another, without all the advice, should, oughts, and “you need to”) the ground is level for us to come face to face with each other and see one another for who we are.

I saw a man at church. My eyes were drawn to him during the sermon. There was something going on inside him, and I wasn’t sure what it was? It was “obvious” he was bored and not paying attention; it was “obvious” that he had no interest in the sermon; I wonder why he showed-up? Did he think he was supposed to? Why was he there? It wasn’t until after the service that I learned that he had just lost his son. There I was, thinking I knew, without having a clue. I wasn’t harsh or judging, I just imagined that the man was bored as the sermon was delivered; little did I know; little do I know.

I can’t imagine the pain; the loss; and the utter disillusionment this man must be experiencing.
I know my personal experience of loss, and I know each of us grieves differently, and I suspect the best I can offer him is to be a loving incanational presence. To assume I know would be playing God.

For me, I need a safe place to tell my story and hear the stories of others. I don’t have it all figured out; all I truly have is my experience, strength, and hope. I can tell you my theology, but I am not so sure what that really means in the whole scheme of things. I don’t know, maybe deep down my experience, strength and hope is my theology. I can tell you what I believe, but I am not so sure how that will impact your reality, especially if you are convinced what I should believe or am supposed to believe and vice versa.

On Advocacy and Semantics

Nick Tarleton commented on my last post, saying:

Conjecture: some people, through some psychological quirk, interpret “opposition to X” as “not wanting any instance of X to exist” - so if you’re opposed to aging, you must want to eliminate all instances of aging in the world, i.e. kill old people.

Conjecture 2: some people conflate judgments about the desirability of traits or states with judgments about the inherent worth of people with those traits/in those states. Evaluating aging as bad is tantamount to evaluating aged people as worth less than the young.

I’ve been thinking about these conjectures since yesterday, and I really do think Nick has hit the proverbial nail on the head here. While the people who oppose longevity medicine obviously vary in terms of their reasons for doing so, I am wondering now if perhaps some of that opposition is rooted in a sense that it is wrong to “medicalize” aging. And as someone who generally prefers the social model of disability to the medical model, I can understand, if not sympathize completely, with this viewpoint. Continue reading

5 Reasons to Sell Your House

Whenever I write articles on the state of the economy, I receive a slew of emails asking the same question: “Should I sell my house?” Most people who write asking whether the time is right to sell their property, haven’t really thought all the issues through. Most are merely considering selling their house because money has become tight. Here’s a typical example:

My wife and I bought a £246,000 house on interest only mortgage with a high street lender for 3years. This period ended last month.

Over the last 4 months I have been unemployed and we have been struggling to pay this mortgage.We now have one and half month payment arrears.

We have also have debt about £46,000 on credit cards and loans to pay. This has also put a dent on our credit rating as we struggle to pay as well.

Our house is now valued at £350,000. Should we sell it to sort ourselves out of these debt or is there any way out of this hell? I don’t want the house repossessed but it is a matter of time. At the moment our monthly income is around £2,400 after tax.

The issue is not whether to sell the house, but how to manage their finances. Sadly, I receive way too many of these types of inquiry. However, I received the first sensibly written query yesterday:

My wife and I are concerned that this may be the top of the residential real estate market in our area. We have talked this over, and we think the equity in our home may be at a peak. We are both willing to rent. In fact, we have talked about moving to a region that has a much lower cost of housing. What do you think?

Such a note reflects a joint decision – which buying and selling a house ought to be. It reflects an awareness of economic options. It reflects an understanding that things are not as they seem. Here are a few reasons to consider selling your house now. Continue reading

Please Help!

You can help maintain the hygiene of this site and thereby advance the progress towards mastery for others. Find out how here.

Global Snapshot

US$ Index 77.34 <<
US Debt 9.057 tril >>
US Debt Limit 9.815 tril

>

Gold $765 >
Silver $13.50 >
Oil $88.60 >
Mil. Bases 760 -
Mil. Expen. $634 bil >
Population 6.62 bil >
Religion 84% -
What is This?

Translate

 

October 2007
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031