All correct philosophies have a certain ‘ring of truth’ to them. Without the ring of truth, the philosophy is either flawed in some way, or the recipient is not yet prepared to be exposed to that philosophy.

My question is, how does one know which applies?

Should a new idea which doesn’t have the ring of truth be immediately discarded because it is flawed, or should a new idea which doesn’t gel be placed in a mental parking space to be addressed later?

Wait, There's More!

Thanks for stopping by to see what all the fuss is about. I hope you enjoyed it! If you did, and you'd like to be updated whenever I publish a new post (totally randomly, but never more than once or twice a week) you can subscribe - for free - and receive regular updates. To receive updates by email, simply complete the Subscription Form in the top right hand corner of every page or, if you're so inclined, click here for the main RSS feed.

And if you want to leave a comment at any time - even if it's just to say hi - you're more than welcome - just leave your thoughts in the block at the end of every post. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks again!

Oh, and before I forget, you really should read my Why I Blog post. It might numb the shock of some of the heretical things I say!